Haseeb Abdullah
Srilanka is making an attempt to put into effect a new law in the country by using banning Burqa which is a Muslim attire and it’s also seeking to close down over a thousand Islamic faculties. The news changed into announced through the Minister of Public Security, Sarath Weerasekara on Saturday and presented an argument in front of the people that sporting Burqa is a shape of “spiritual extremism”.
Srilanka is the usa where Buddhism gets followed predominantly however there is additionally a vast quantity of Muslim populace. As consistent with the present day facts, it is now believed that the usa has nearly million Muslims.
“In our early days Muslim ladies and ladies in no way wore the burqa,” he stated. “It is an indication of non secular extremism that took place these days. We are honestly going to prohibit it.”
While talking about shutting down almost a thousand Islamic faculties, the minister said that the Islamic colleges in the u . S . A . Are not sticking to the national curriculum and were going against their academic policy as mentioned via Independent UK.
“Nobody can open a faculty and educate anything you need to the youngsters,” he said.
The Burqa changed into additionally banned in Sri Lanka in 2019 on a brief basis after a set of Islamic militants did a series of terror assaults within the us of a at accommodations and church buildings and claimed more than 250 lives.
Sri Lanka is not the simplest u . S . A . Within the international to ban the Burqa, in fact, it will be a part of 19 such nations that banned full-face insurance. Countries like France, Austria, Germany, and the Netherlands dominated out the banning of the burqa in 2018, and only remaining week, Switzerland also voted in the favor of banning the burqa completely.
According to the chair of the referendum committee, Walter Wobmann burqa is “a image for this extreme, political Islam which has grow to be increasingly more distinguished in Europe and which has no vicinity in Switzerland”.
Amnesty International known as the ban “a dangerous symbolic policy that violates freedom of expression and religion”.
