Supreme Court Reviews Allegations of Judicial Interference Amid Calls for Enhanced Independence and Accountability
A six-member bench, led by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, resumes hearing allegations of interference in judicial affairs, as six Islamabad High Court judges raise concerns. The judges accused the country’s security apparatus of meddling in judicial matters, citing instances of abduction, torture of relatives, and secret surveillance.
Amid mounting pressure, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and CJP Isa discussed forming an inquiry commission, later approved by the federal cabinet. However, the appointed ex-CJP Tassaduq Hussain Jillani recused himself, prompting the SC to take suo motu notice of the matter.
The ongoing hearing witnessed Attorney General of Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan’s appearance before the apex court. Chief Justice Isa emphasized the importance of addressing the IHC judges’ proposals transparently, highlighting concerns of interference. The SC ordered the proposals to be made public, emphasizing the need to empower high courts while ensuring judicial independence.
Justices echoed the urgency to address intimidation tactics and protect judicial integrity. The letter by IHC judges outlined several instances of alleged interference by intelligence operatives, including surveillance and intimidation tactics. The SC’s scrutiny seeks to bolster judicial autonomy and confront systemic challenges to safeguard the judiciary’s independence.